The data that was just released indicates that Shalom Drizin, a landlord in the Crown Heights neighborhood, was identified as one of the most active evictors in Brooklyn in 2018.
The man in charge of managing the Ebbets Field development on Bedford Avenue, Mr. Shalom Drizin, is ranked as the second-ranking evictor by well-known renter rights organizations, including The RTCNYC Coalition & JustFix. NYC.
The Worst Evictors NYC maps were created by the aforementioned groups to educate New York City inhabitants about their rights as renters and landlords they have access to.
A newly formed website offered a list of the top 5 most heinous evictors in the Brooklyn borough. Shalom Drizin finished in second place, behind The Pinnacle Group, which filed 5,000 eviction notices in less than two years, according to The New York Times. 16 families living in the Ebbets Field Residential Development were forced out by Shalom Drizin.
These renters have regularly complained about unsafe living conditions that have not received enough attention. In addition, there have been frequent fire accidents and potential legal violations resulting from unauthorized rate increases.
From the map that is shown, it is evident that Pinnacle was the dominant party in charge of evicting 27 households in the neighborhoods of Crown Heights, Prospect-Lefferts Gardens, and Flatbush.
One Times article states that their methods were used to prompt an investigation by the Attorney General in 2006, which was followed by the passage of a local law in 2008.
According to this law, tenants have the right to file a lawsuit on the grounds of harassment against their landlords.
Nineteen families in the boroughs of Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx were jointly evicted by a group of tenants, including Shalom Drizin, Jacob, Naftali Hager, and Moshe Piller.
Three households in all were forced to leave the one house at 100 East 21st St. in the Flatbush neighborhood.
In the same year, Moshe Piller was also in charge of eight households’ evictions. Piller is the owner of multiple real estate properties in Brooklyn, one of which was the location where two neonates sadly died in 2016 due to a broken heater. A cartographic representation provides a visual representation of the data.
Supporters claim that eight households were evicted by Flatbush landlord Michael Niamonitakis, who ranked ninth on the list of the city’s most problematic landlords in 2016.
A lawsuit was filed against Meridian Properties, a real estate company after a 58-year-old man died of hypothermia in his Crown Heights home. Tenants had regularly complained about the building’s insufficient heating before to this tragedy.
With Pillar serving as the focal point of attention, the Anti-Eviction Mapping Project arranged a public gathering outside Brooklyn Housing Court. Along with the previously mentioned people, public advocate Jumaane Williams also voiced his criticism of those who engage in mass evictions in an attempt to profit from the rising value of homes in Brooklyn.
Williams has shown that he is firmly in favor of the recently passed Right to Counsel law. According to the aforementioned laws, landlords must provide tenants with legal counsel during housing court hearings.
According to Williams, this action could lessen the increasing number of eviction cases. Additionally, he claims that the current juncture offers a favorable opportunity to improve the effectiveness of rent regulation as well as to expand its application to provide protections to a substantial proportion of the population that is currently without them.
According to Williams, people are showing a high preference for the expectation that swift action will be taken regarding this issue.
Who Is the Owner What resource is available to New York City citizens who want to learn more about the methods landlords use for evictions? With the use of this application, foreclosure events on different properties owned by the same owner can be tracked.
Shalom Drizin: Ebbets Field Tenants Request Immediate Repairs from Landlord
On the first day of the landlord hearing, tenants of Ebbets Field Apartments came to voice their dissatisfaction with the ongoing problems with the building’s elevators.
Seven complaints have been formally filed in the Brooklyn Housing Court against Shalom Drizin, Benjamin Baum, and Fieldbridge Associates, the landlords, for allegedly neglecting to promptly attend to the elevator maintenance problems.
Michele Waterman, a longtime resident of the complex, claims that older people, like her 82-year-old mother, have trouble getting to and from their homes on time due to the unpredictable condition of the elevators.
Moreover, Waterman elaborated on how the frequent elevator malfunctions made it extremely difficult for her to maintain employment since being late can negatively impact her career opportunities. The people who are affected describe the circumstances as quite upsetting.
The tenants of Ebbets Field Apartments met on the first day of the landlord investigation to voice their dissatisfaction with the ongoing problems with the building’s elevator.
Seven cases against landlords Shalom Drizin, Benjamin Baum, and Fieldbridge Associates for neglecting to take action on maintenance issues with elevators were accepted by the Brooklyn Housing Court.
The complex’s owner, Michele Waterman, has raised attention to the problem of faulty elevators. Waterman has highlighted the difficulties she and her mother, who is eighty-two, face in leaving and arriving home on time.
In addition, Waterman has explained how the elevator’s persistent problems turned into a significant barrier to her continuing in her position, since being late might negatively impact her employment status.
All things considered, the situation as it stands now has been described as a significant source of worry for the occupants of the Ebbets Field Apartments.
Drizin Shalom: Case Study
Shalom Drizin, Salabakis V.
PERSPECTIVE
The appellants are attempting to contest the ruling that denied their request to have a nonparty witness testify. The conclusion that no noteworthy or unique information had been given to support the inquiry was the basis for this decision.
An agent who wanted to get paid an agency commission was the one suing. The Salabakis asserted that they had employed every Shalom Drizin to locate a buyer for a certain New York home.
The seller claims that they were able to find a buyer who was prepared, eager, and able to purchase the item for the price that was agreed upon. As such, they contend that they are entitled to a portion of the sale.
In a motion submitted, Shalom Drizin requested permission to question non-party witness Bernard Tannenbaum. Tannenbaum represented the potential bidder in court.
Tannenbaum was contacted before the motion started to get his informed consent, which he refused to give.
In their capacity as legal counsel, Tannenbaum would have had access to important information about the potential buyer’s readiness, willingness, and ability to complete the purchase and the reasons for the sale’s failure, according to the motion for assistance.
This information is essential when assessing the plaintiff’s eligibility for a brokerage fee. Based on both legal and factual considerations, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s verdict in a majority decision.
Under the specific guidelines and restrictions stated in the court’s decision, the court used its discretion to grant the application, enabling Shalom Drizin to cross-examine Tannenbaum as a nonparty witness. In connection with this matter, the complainant is entitled to $50 in fees and expenses from the respondent.
About Shalom DrizinÂ
Shalom Drizin is one of the most well-known and respected names in real estate investing. He currently lives in the Brooklyn neighborhood of Crown Heights.Â
The person in question is employed as Head Officer at Fieldbridge Associates LLC, a business situated in a tall residential complex in Brooklyn that is sandwiched between the Prospect Lefferts Gardens and Crown Heights areas.Â
Shalom Drizin is a well-known figure in the real estate sector with a sizable collection of properties under his control. As so, his position as an extraordinarily impoverished landlord takes precedence over his formal education and dignified manner. To learn more about the topic, click the following link:Â
https://reedsy.com/shalom-drizin
The Bottom LineÂ
The Salabakis challenged the denial of their request to question a third party over a legal matter with an agency panel. The individuals presented a case for a portion of the money received from the sale of property that Shalom Drizin arranged, claiming that the buyer had demonstrated both readiness and willingness to enter into the transaction.
Bernard Tannenbaum was the buyer’s attorney, and Shalom Drizin tried to question him to get important information about what the buyer wanted to acquire and why the deal didn’t work out. When first attempts were made to get Tannenbaum’s consent, he refused.
The Supreme Court overturned the lower court’s decision for both legal and factual reasons. Additionally, the party who was sued was compensated $50 for costs related to the previously described lawsuit.
